#WEBWATCHER VS SPECTOR PRO INSTALL#
#WEBWATCHER VS SPECTOR PRO SOFTWARE#

#WEBWATCHER VS SPECTOR PRO SOFTWARE#

A hardware keylogger would also typically not be visible on the software level (as e.g., an installed program visible in the Windows 7 Control Panel > Programs and Features list). People do not typically inspect the backs and cables on public computers indeed, they may not even do so on their home computers, nor may their system administrators regularly do so on office desktops. (Note that unplugging and replugging keyboards or mice might render them nonworking, at least until a reboot.) This sort of device would be readily visible to anyone who would inspect the back of the computer and both ends of any keyboard or mouse extension cords that might be plugged into it вЂ“ although, even then, some people might assume that the device was supposed to be there.

#WEBWATCHER VS SPECTOR PRO INSTALL#

So, for example, you could insert it long enough to get someoneвЂ™s administrative password, and then remove it and use the administrative password to install keylogging software. It sounded like some of these devices might fail to keep up with a fast typist.ДЄn advantage of such a device would be that, unlike typical software, you would not need administrative rights to install it. Except where the purpose of a password could be identified (e.g., occurring at the very start of a session), it seemed that the output of this device might be most useful for retrieving the contents of coherent texts (e.g., emails, memos) typed by the user of the machine. The dongle would also presumably not capture incoming data (e.g., other partiesвЂ™ responses on a chat page). It would presumably be difficult to identify the significance of even an important text string (e.g., a password) buried within a lot of other text, or typed in a webpage initiated via mouse click (as distinct from typing the webpageвЂ™s URL, which would be a clue as to the significance of whatever might be typed next). It appeared that the contents of a typical keylogging dongle would not be formatted in any particular way it would just be a text file with all the keystrokes mashed together. (Note the difference between a keylogging dongle and a harmless adapter from one kind of plug to another.) But someone with some money to spend (or the ability to build it him/herself) could instead use a wireless dongle, leave it in place, and receive its contents through automated emails to his/her inbox. The dongle would capture what was typed into the keyboard, and then the person who had inserted the dongle would secretly remove it and take it elsewhere to review its contents. You would plug the keyboard into the dongle, and plug the dongle into the computer. For example, Amazon offered little dongles for both USB and PS/2 keyboards. It was true that one could buy a physical device to capture keystrokes. Those initial impressions failed to anticipate the spectrum of possibilities available on the hardware side.

It appeared that software keylogging would depend upon a certain operating system вЂ“ for example, a software keylogger designed to run in Windows would obviously not run on a system booted with some other operating system (e.g., Linux) вЂ“ while a hardware-oriented keylogging technique would tend to capture keystrokes and, in some approaches, would capture visual information as well. One difference was that hardware keylogging would require someone to plug or install some physical device into my computer, whereas software keylogging would involve installation of a software program onto my computer. Many sites told me that there was hardware keylogging, and then there was software keylogging. Note also that the discussion of legality is postponed to the end of this piece, so as to be informed by the following insights about the various hardware and software keylogging possibilities. Note that, while this post concentrates on computers, keylogging is also possible for smartphones.

I decided to learn more about the matter. I had heard that people could capture what you were typing into your computer, and might then see which websites you were visiting (e.g., banking, porn), what you were typing there, who you were chatting with, what you were saying, and so forth.

Webwatcher vs spector pro